Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA22430 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sun, 22 Apr 2001 18:08:53 +0100 Subject: Re: The Status of Memetics as a Science Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:05:05 -0400 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010422170505.AAA7574@email@example.com> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Hi Robin Faichney -
>But if you don't mean physically
>isolate, just what do you mean?
Define the mechanism- the steps required- the recipe. Aristotle did just
that with his Poetics.
We are increasingly defining the recipes of idea distribution (and
replication, if you will), and a technology has developed.
The human being ain't changed in thousands of years, so the mechanisms of
affecting his perceptions ain't changed either. What has changed is the
technologies of distribution.
Recipes all physically isolate the ingredients, and the steps are
isolated to produce an expected result. Drama has isolate ingredients,
and recipes to elicit emotional responses, all fairly well-defined.
Mechanisms of influence are linked cheek to jowl with mechanisms of
Memetics could, should, might, be the science that links the mechanisms
of perception with the mechanisms of cultural stability.
And all stable things exist within patterns.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 22 2001 - 18:12:11 BST