Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA21143 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Sun, 22 Apr 2001 01:10:45 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [18.104.22.168] From: "Scott Chase" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: The Status of Memetics as a Science Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 20:06:51 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <F67PNXRPmcarcR4ZDgC00010133@hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2001 00:06:51.0657 (UTC) FILETIME=[21D5DF90:01C0CAC0] Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>From: Robin Faichney <email@example.com>
>Subject: Re: The Status of Memetics as a Science
>Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:36:07 +0100
>On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:54:41PM -0700, J. R. Molloy wrote:
> > From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > > I find little difficulty in distinguishing religion from memetics.
> > > models and tracks the spread of ideas and beliefs. Religion is
> > > beliefs (whether they are 'correct' or not). At a mimimum, then,
> > > meta to religion.
> > In further support of your excellent comments, I'd add that memetics is
> > religion as science is to faith.
>How does faith in memetics as a science fit in there?
Good point. Very good point.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 22 2001 - 01:14:02 BST