Re: The Status of Memetics as a Science

From: Robin Faichney (
Date: Sat Apr 21 2001 - 10:34:32 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science"

    Received: by id LAA19696 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 11:36:52 +0100
    Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 10:34:32 +0100
    Subject: Re: The Status of Memetics as a Science
    Message-ID: <>
    References: <[]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <[]>; from on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:11:59PM -0400
    From: Robin Faichney <>
    Precedence: bulk

    On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:11:59PM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > But, is it not somewhat dangerous to give those who would prey upon this
    > ease of influence a new name, 'memetic engineer', (as well as invent the
    > discipline, 'memetic engineering'), rather than isolate the mechanism
    > itself, and allow ethics more prevalence over judgment?

    You can't isolate a pattern -- especially one that's part of a complex

    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 21 2001 - 11:40:07 BST