Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA19017 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sat, 21 Apr 2001 05:07:48 +0100 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:08:01 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) From: TJ Olney <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Subject: Re: Genetic transmission of phallic attraction?!? [was Re: memes and sexuality] In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.21.0104202031330.162-100000@C157775-A.frndl1.wa.home.com> X-X-Sender: email@example.com Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Logical typing problems again.
> > A genetically transmitted tendency to be attracted to phallic power
> > symbols, though, is another matter, which I think only a rabid
> > anti-psychologist or the like could insist should not be taken
> > seriously.
> You are kidding are you? Does this mean that our genes determine what we are
> attracted to? Non-sense.... again a bio-reductivist viewpoint. You might as
> well *say* that we are attracted guns because, by proxy, the assertion could
> be made.
So, genetics doesn't determine or influence anything? I suppose that females
attract males and viceversa purely because of culture...
Two things to clear up here, 1) the difference between predisposition and
determinancy. And 2) These two things are of different logical types and
must be treated at the appropriate logical level.
If genetic selection favors males who gravitate toward powerful tools that
can be wielded as weapons, then genetics are determining a predisposition.
If that set of genes are raised in a memepool with access to and beliefs
about using such weapons, then we have Robin's situation.
There is no biological reductionism. I recommend Lynch's treatment of this
difference in regard to homosexuality in Thought Contagion.
A further muddling occurs in Robin's statement when he asserts the
interpretation of a gun as a "phallic power symbol." To the extent that it
is such a thing, that is memetic. The physical power embodied in it as an
explosive killing device is something quite different.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 21 2001 - 05:13:33 BST