RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Fri Apr 20 2001 - 22:13:38 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science"

    Received: by id WAA18377 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 22:17:30 +0100
    Subject: RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science
    Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:13:38 -0400
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    Hi Lawrence DeBivort -

    >It does establish some expectation in my mind about the
    >likelihood of its continued usefulness, but I don't think of this
    >expectation as 'faith' in any sense of the word being used here.

    And that's a wonderful description of what a scientist means when he says
    'faith', and what is so often wrapped around something quite different by
    those who would 'faith' us into belief....

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 20 2001 - 22:22:49 BST