Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA18142 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:19:41 +0100 Subject: Re: Is Suicide Contagious? A Case Study in Applied Memetics Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:15:31 -0400 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "memetics list" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010420201552.AAA8642@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 04/20/01 15:48, Robin Faichney said this-
>But is anyone really suggesting that genuinely
>non-suicidal people might be influenced to commit suicide?
More to my original ethical consternation about these experiments, and
JR's original wording, how else can you offer proof of influence except
that you've managed to make someone kill themselves?
And how can you prove that unless you have people who have no inclination
to do anything like that in the first place?
I, personally, don't 'believe' in hypnosis because I am not hypnotizable-
although I totally agree that some people are highly suggestible and
respond as if hypnotizing were a real phenomenon. But, yes, "They Call It
Well, they call it media influence, too.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 20 2001 - 21:22:58 BST