Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA18079 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:00:34 +0100 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:41:44 +0100 To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science Message-ID: <20010420204144.C969@ii01.org> References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745DC4@inchna.stir.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745DC4@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from email@example.com on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:20:38AM +0100 From: Robin Faichney <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:20:38AM +0100, Vincent Campbell wrote:
> You're right here Robin, it wasn't necessarily the best choice of phrase-
> without qualification anyway. It's that old point that beliefs don't have
> to be "true" and Gods don't have to exist to have effects and consequences.
Yup. Gods are meme(plexe)s, just like Mickey Mouse, the Presidency of
the United States and all the contents of the Library of Congress.
> In that sense gods are still entities whether or not they really exist (in
> the material sense of something you could, as the monkey king did in
> 'Journey to the West', pee on. In his case he thought it was one of the
> five pillars at the end of the universe, only to find out it was Bhudda's
> fingers, and for his arrogance he was imprisoned under a mountain. at least
> that's what happened in the TV version).
-- Robin Faichney Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 20 2001 - 21:07:22 BST