Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA17974 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:35:49 +0100 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:19:23 +0100 To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: memes and sexuality Message-ID: <20010420201923.D772@ii01.org> References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745DBE@inchna.stir.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745DBE@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from email@example.com on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:15:08PM +0100 From: Robin Faichney <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:15:08PM +0100, Vincent Campbell wrote:
> I was making a joke on that bit... but the other part stands though, about
> the genetic determination of gun use. Seems highly unlikely to me.
Anyone who seriously suggested that gun use itself could be genetically
determined would deserve to be treated as a joke.
A genetically transmitted tendency to be attracted to phallic power
symbols, though, is another matter, which I think only a rabid
anti-psychologist or the like could insist should not be taken seriously.
-- Robin Faichney Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 20 2001 - 20:39:09 BST