Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA10590 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:27:25 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745DAC@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: Is Suicide Contagious? A Case Study in Applied Memetics Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:24:02 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> In order for suicides to be truly contagious one has to surely
> >> that the conditions which conventionally lead to suicidal tendencies
>> what are being transferred. I don't see any evidence of that.
<What do you mean by "conditions"?>
Sorry, very poor choice of phrase. But I suppose I mean that
witnessing a suicide on a TV soap, is very different from experiencing
neglect, or abuse, or clinical depression.
<Can a non-suicidal (or near suicidal) person hear of a suicide and
then go and
> feel depressed? Can this depression resonate with other feelings or lie
> dormant until it reaches critical mass?>
Well, I don't believe so, certainly not to the extent or with the
rapidity that the correlative data, that Paul refers to, suggests. Think
about it anecdotally- when was the last time you witnessed a suicide (or
murder) on TV and felt compelled to attempt it yourself? That's not how we
use the media.
>> If this were true, then by default it should be true of other
>> behaviours also- murder for example. Yet how many murders do
>> hear/read/see through the media relative to the number they
<Reading is only one form of memetic input. How about music, peer
> other vectors?>
The point still stands with regard to other forms of media input.
Social interaction on the other hand- like peer pressure- is something very
different. After all the outbreak of "contagious" suicide in- where was it-
Micronesia(?) seems to have had a lot to do with peer pressure.
<Here's the way Marsden put it:
> "This paper presents one vision of memetics, as an integrated part of
> social science investigating substantive issues of human experience.
> Understanding memetics as contagion psychology, using selectionist
> thinking to
> inform interpretation, is certainly not the only way to conceptualise the
> nascent discipline, but it is hoped that it is one that will allow
> after a quarter of a century of discussion, to start providing useful
> into real-world issues and problems."
> Opinion aside, I think it worthwhile to study the matter further.>
Oh yeah, agreed. I've read Paul's interesting piece. I actually
think my contention was not with Paul's ideas, but the way some on the this
picked it up rather too loosely.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:30:51 BST