Re: memetics-digest V1 #636

Date: Tue Apr 17 2001 - 22:45:05 BST

  • Next message: Aaron Agassi: "Re: Hidden women"

    Received: by id WAA09049 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:49:04 +0100
    From: <>
    Message-ID: <>
    Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:45:05 EDT
    Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #636
    Content-Type:  multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_9a.1303aac5.280e1361_boundary"
    Content-Disposition:  Inline
    X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10520
    Precedence: bulk
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    In a message dated 4/17/01 12:49:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time, writes:

    > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 21:44:16 +0300
    > From: daniella <>
    > Subject: Hidden women...
    > Re memes and sexuality/gender Bias for Memes.
    > kenneth wrote:
    > Not many females take actually part in the discussions, and that is
    > just a
    > way in how you must see what JR means. Is memetics somehow male-
    > gender related !?
    > As a long-time lurker on this list - I should like to say the actual
    > subject of memetics does and has interested me. The often aggressive
    > and
    > sometimes pompous manner of disagreeing on this list - makes me
    > refrain from participating. Could this be the reason others of my
    > gender stay away too?
    > We are, after all, a gentle gender;-)))
    > daniella

    Hello, all-
    As another woman lurking here, I agree completely with Daniella!

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 17 2001 - 22:52:11 BST