Re: Determinism

Date: Sun Apr 15 2001 - 22:23:44 BST

  • Next message: Aaron Agassi: "Re: Determinism"

    Received: by id WAA04319 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:21:04 +0100
    From: <>
    Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 16:23:44 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Message-ID: <3AD9CB10.32613.3A51B4@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <000c01c0c590$69056e60$>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Precedence: bulk

    On 15 Apr 2001, at 5:42, Aaron Agassi wrote:

    > Since I hold Superdeterminism necessary and sufficient for freedom, my
    > position, precisely, is that omniscience would narrow down choices to
    > the one optimal decision. Never the less, this would be, indeed,
    > empowering, of course.
    Such as which one of the two perfectly suited values one should
    use to solve a given quadratic equation? Degrees of perfection;
    hmmm. Perhaps you're ready to count fractal iterations of angels
    on the heads of pins.

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 22:24:10 BST