From: Tim Rhodes (email@example.com)
Date: Mon 19 Jun 2006 - 07:42:06 GMT
Ted, Ted, Ted....
You're barking up the entirely wrong tree here, m'boy -- memetics concerns
itself with aspects of accident, not essence.
(So you can put down that copy of Atlas Shrugged and move past it already...
it won't apply here. ;)
>>It's a core belief of memetics that cultural meaning is
>>contained in artifacts such as books, musical scores,
>>game rules, etc.
> This statement seems incorrect to me, although to be honest, I can't
> it well because,
> (1) I'm not entirely sure what exactly you mean by the term "cultural
> above. ("of cultural significance"? "interpretation within a cultural
> "significance to individuals of a specific culture"? or something else
Now, Ted, rather than clip the relevant question -- perhaps to evade the
hard work of explaining & defending terms you yourself have consciously
chosen to employ (as happened your last response) -- I hope, rather, that
you could do the following for me:
Refer to the current subject line (above & of your own e-mail, sent on Sat,
17 Jun 2006 @ 8:34:09) and answer clearly in your own words this simple
What specific concept did you hope to invoke by term "cultural meaning"
p.s. You see, Ted, we must work to ensure that both of us are using the
same signifiers to signal similar concepts from the very start, if there is
to be any communication at all -- let alone a functional & useful dialogue!
"Now 'why a thing is itself' is a meaningless inquiry"
- Aristotle, Metaphysics Book VII, Part 17
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 19 Jun 2006 - 08:02:06 GMT