From: Russ Volckmann (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat 17 Jun 2006 - 15:44:15 GMT
I wonder if Eric Voegelin's distinctions between Urbilder and Denkbilder
(primal image and though image) might be useful. It provides an avenue for understanding meaning as something derived subjectively and objectively. The primal image cannot be judged true or false since they are merely a reflection of individual worldview. It is Ortega's world of mere impressions.
The image of thought is where we bring in concepts, judgments, theory and
the philosophical approach to thinking about our experiences. They can be
challenged . Some are more useful than others.
In any case, I wonder about your thoughts regarding including both of these
aspects in understanding and experiencing meaning.
-- Russ Volckmann, PhD LeadCoach Coaching Leaders in Business and Life http://www.leadcoach.com Integral Leadership Review 831.333.9200 =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 17 Jun 2006 - 16:04:38 GMT