From: Keith Henson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu 09 Feb 2006 - 18:18:35 GMT
At 03:02 PM 2/9/2006 +0000, Douglas Brooker wrote:
>the problem I think, as some of the replies indicate, including the above,
>is that some have jumped right into the substantive issues, good-bad,
>right-wrong, rather than a memetic analysis.
Correct. For example, why did the cartoon meme take the time it did and
not more or less time to snowball?
>Should not an adequate account of this start off with an account of the
>commentator's own memeplex of values which are to be used the subsequent
I am not sure "values" is the correct term to use in analyzing the
psychological "forces" behind the spread of the "cartoon meme".
My preferred takeoff point for looking at this is evolutionary
psychology. In theory, and to a large extent by those who use it,
evolutionary psychology is "value free."
Deplorable as the situations are in regard to battered wife syndrome,
understanding the evolutionary context that gave rise to the psychological
trait of "capture-bonding" is or at least should be value free.
I could mention another example, but fear to do so for starting a flame war
about the subject and not the underlying science.
>One reference, for example to "the protective strength to the religion
>given by the hypersensitivity to criticism aspects of the
>ideology." ought to be deconstructed for its own memetic qualities.
>so what is the 'hypersensitivity' meme? is it a purely subjective
>assessment residing in the minds of those who use the word? can some
>objective truth or insight about the meme in question result from the
>application of "hypersentitivity" as a measure?
Evolutionary psychology models give you reason to expect that sensitivity
to memes that lead to wars and other forms of social disruption is
dependant on measurable factors, particularly the per capita economic
history and future prospects.
>might comparison between 'honour cultures' and 'no honour cultures' be
>there is a lot buried here.
>first thing is to define the meme? yes? no?
No. Memes are elements of culture or replicating information
patterns. Very broad definition.
>is it the cartoon? if so what are the qualities of the cartoon? Or is
>the meme the reaction to the qualities of the cartoon. what exactly is
>spreading? what are memetic qualities of the reactions in the western media?
It isn't important how you sort out the technical definitions of what is
causing people to charge into gunfire. What is important if you want to do
anything with the knowledge is understanding why they are doing it *now*
and not ten or 20 or 50 years ago.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 09 Feb 2006 - 18:39:37 GMT