From: Ben Dawson (email@example.com)
Date: Sat 28 Jan 2006 - 18:39:29 GMT
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:52:48 -0500, you wrote:
>At 07:29 PM 1/27/2006 -0500, Keith wrote:
>>First, you need to analyze human behaviors
>I am curious about something. My postings rarely get follow ups, and not
>Among the reasons . . . .
>The postings are clear and so obvious nobody has a comment.
>The postings are so unclear or esoteric that nobody can make sense of them.
>I am not just fishing for compliments, I am really in the dark.
I can only speak for myself, but the reason I do not usually reply to
your messages, is that I cannot add anything over and above what you
have already said. Ditto with most other messages in this list.
I'm a "knowledge leecher" on this list. I read the articles with great
interest, but struggle to offer much back in return.
Perhaps that's why others don't reply as much to your messages, in
which case it indicates, as Richard commented, that you've cleared
matters up pretty well on your own!
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 28 Jan 2006 - 19:02:08 GMT