From: Kate Distin (email@example.com)
Date: Wed 18 Jan 2006 - 10:30:17 GMT
Price, Ilfryn wrote:
> I hope your advice includes not force feeding the kids religion before the age of say 6 so that they are free to make their own
> choices later rather than programmed.
>>Oh, suspicious one. Book two is "Gifted Children: A Guide for Parents
> and Professionals" (Jessica Kingsley Publishers, April 2006). And thank
> you. I've been wondering how with a clear conscience I could get a plug
> in on such a completely irrelevant list.
> Ok, maybe not a *totally* clear conscience.
Obviously the book isn't about religion at all. Why would it be?
But there are some interesting points, memetic and otherwise, in your
Do you really believe that children under the age of 6 cannot ask
questions about what they are told? My children are 3 and 6, and I can
tell you that this is not my experience!
I "force feed" my children with all manner of my own prejudices,
beliefs, attitudes and morals, all the time, consciously and
unconsciously. We all do. Why should religion be any different?
Presumably you would "force feed" yours with atheism, amongst other
things. It's what we do as parents. If we honestly believe something
to be true then of course that's what we tell our children.
BUT this doesn't preclude our also telling them that other people have
different attitudes, and expecting to have to justify our own when our
children ask questions. You can imagine that as the
ceaselessly-questioning children of a former RE teacher and a goalie for
a Sikh hockey team, mine have a better grasp of some other faiths than
many children their age. They also know that most of their friends and
relatives do not go to church or believe in Jesus. Just as they know
that lots of other families make different choices about lots of things
from us. I don't see why religion should be given special treatment in
I also don't get why religion, or anything else, should be seen as
something with which we are "programmed" as small children. Case in
point: my own parents "force fed" me with no claims about God, positive
or negative, although they did assure me that Santa and the tooth fairy
existed. Yet not only did I shed these latter beliefs at the normal
sort of time, I don't even impose them upon my own children. Our family
doesn't "do" Santa and the tooth fairy, although of course they know
that most other families do.
This is where I get back to meta-representation, I guess. We can
meta-represent: we can reflect on what we are told, wonder whether it's
true, test it out for ourselves, synthesise information and observations
from a variety of sources. We aren't mindlessly "programmed" by our
memes. We select them as they compete for our attention.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 18 Jan 2006 - 10:51:15 GMT