Re: Me against the meme

From: Kenneth Van Oost (
Date: Tue 01 Nov 2005 - 19:33:06 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: The evolution of "evolution""

    Derek wrote,
    > > Creationism only flourishes when people are poorly educated about
    biology. Dace wrote,
    > Quite the contrary, creationism flourishes when people are all too aware
    > the mechanistic claims of biology. If you're going to have a mechanism,
    > shouldn't you have a mechanic? All the machines that ever existed in the
    > history of the world were built through intelligent design.

    << Maybe so, but has it to be !? Why can 't you accept the notion that a ID isn 't necessary to explain the wonderful things that go on in nature !? Why turning back the clock 2000 years and evocate questions that even Plato long ago lay aside !? In the world which shows itself to us in all its grandeur, why searching for combine elements to bring order into the chaos !?

    The problem to find a coherent reality which forms the bias for all of the perplexity of nature is still here, but I don 't understand why it must be a ID or a thing called creatonism ! Ted, come up to date with what lives today...



    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 01 Nov 2005 - 20:24:31 GMT