From: Dace (email@example.com)
Date: Fri 28 Oct 2005 - 21:51:14 GMT
> Wednesday, October 26, 2005, 8:06:27 AM, Dace wrote:
> > From a material standpoint nothing mediates the mutual attraction or
> > repulsion of objects as a result of either gravity or magnetism. This
> > why the field is postulated, in order to account for the undeniable
> > of such long-range effects. No field of physics has ever been detected.
> > Rather, it is *deduced.* The strength of a field must be calculated on
> > basis of abstract equations, not read off from a meter that directly
> > measures it.
> I recently used something called a "field strength meter" to measure
> microwave radiation around my house. (I live within 120m of a mast
> with several arrays.) Regarding magnetism, I have a very handy device
> called a compass.
Compasses existed long before field theory. That a compass reacts to the
presence of a field must be deduced. Assuming our deduction is correct,
both the "field strength meter" and the compass are measuring the effects of
electromagnetic fields. That your meter is actually called a "field
strength meter" only goes to show the universality of the field theory
inference. The formulae for computing field strength are evidently built
into the device.
> Let me know when you have such things for your fields.
Like the inference of electromagnetic fields, holistic effects in biology
can also be deduced from observations. Regarding the production of termite
mounds, which are essentially free-standing lungs that provide oxygen to
termites and remove carbon dioxide, E. O. Wilson has this to say:
"It is all but impossible to conceive how one colony member can oversee more
than a minute fraction of the work or envision in its entirety the plan of
such a finished product. Some of these nests require many worker lifetimes
to complete, and each new addition must somehow be brought into a proper
relationship with the previous parts. The existence of such nests leads
inevitably to the conclusion that the workers interact in a very orderly and
predictable manner. But how can the workers communicate so effectively over
such long periods of time? Also, who has the blueprint of the nest?"
(Quoted by Sheldrake, The Presence of the Past, Times Books, 1988, p. 229)
By all appearanches, the coordinated activity of termites cannot be
attributed to their ability to communicate. Rather, a field effect seems to
be at work. To test this hypothesis, the naturalist Eugene Marais inserted
a steel plate through the middle of a termite mound, preventing any
communication between the separated termites. Nonetheless, termites were
able to build arches that met perfectly on opposite sides of the plate as if
it wasn't even there. Termites act more like particles in a field of
influence than separate actors. The same could be said of the cells
comprising our bodies.
More recently, Miroslav Hill demonstrated field effects among bacteria being
tested for resistance to a carcinogenic substance. He found that alongside
the exposed bacteria, related bacteria in physically isolated containers
also developed resistance. After repeating the experiment numerous times,
ensuring absolute separation of the bacterial colonies, he got the same
results. He concluded that the exposed bacteria shared information at a
distance with the unexposed bacteria. Interestingly, Hill chose to
interpret the results in terms of quantum entanglement or nonlocality rather
than the more traditional field theory.
There'll never be a simple device for measuring such effects in biology, as
the only way to measure them is via organisms. For instance, Sheldrake used
a dog to demonstrate the existence of a field of influence embracing both
the dog and his owner. When a skeptic named Richard Wiseman tried to refute
Sheldrake's findings with his own experiment, instead he replicated
You noted in a different post that scientists have no difficulty accepting
invisible phenomenon. This is true of physicists but not biologists. Where
physicists readily accept the evidence for action at a distance, biologists
remain wedded to contact mechanics. This just goes to show that while a
meme dies off in one environment, it may continue flourishing in another.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 28 Oct 2005 - 22:11:10 GMT