Re[3]: The evolution of "evolution"

From: Robin Faichney (
Date: Thu 27 Oct 2005 - 08:53:42 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: Re[3]: The evolution of "evolution""

    Wednesday, October 26, 2005, 8:06:27 AM, Dace wrote:

    > From a material standpoint nothing mediates the mutual attraction or
    > repulsion of objects as a result of either gravity or magnetism. This is
    > why the field is postulated, in order to account for the undeniable reality
    > of such long-range effects. No field of physics has ever been detected.
    > Rather, it is *deduced.* The strength of a field must be calculated on the
    > basis of abstract equations, not read off from a meter that directly
    > measures it.

    I recently used something called a "field strength meter" to measure microwave radiation around my house. (I live within 120m of a mast with several arrays.) Regarding magnetism, I have a very handy device called a compass. Let me know when you have such things for your fields.

    Best regards,
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 27 Oct 2005 - 09:14:30 GMT