Re: The evolution of

From: Derek Gatherer (
Date: Tue 11 Oct 2005 - 08:32:14 GMT

  • Next message: Derek Gatherer: "Re: The evolution of "evolution""

    >, but Derek's confidence that a
    >set of growth factors 'explain' ontogenesis is problematic, too.

    It's a bit more subtle than that, Mark. Not just growth factors but a whole host of molecules acting in a finely tuned program, the details of which are known in depth. Peter Lawrence called his book:
    "The Making of a Fly: The Genetics of Animal Design" for a reason. That wasn't hyperbole, even when he wrote it in 1992. That's where the state of play already was at the time, and now it's an order of magnitude more advanced. There's nothing problematic about it.

    If you don't fancy spending $57 on Lawrence's book, try or the PNAS reviews I mentioned in a previous message.

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 11 Oct 2005 - 08:50:44 GMT