From: Robin Faichney (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu 21 Jul 2005 - 15:53:24 GMT
Thursday, July 21, 2005, 3:53:26 PM, Chris wrote:
> Grow up non-white in Leeds (or one of many oter places), feel
> put upon, have internal memes (or whatever) that exclude lots,
> but favour others. There's nothing 'bad' about the weeds that
> grow where there is not climax forest; they are just as valid.
> There is nothing 'wrong' with wanting to kill maim and destroy;
> this is not a malfunction, it is just another set of behaviours.
> I abhor this murderous idiocy (before anyone jumps down my
> throat) but it is not tricky to explain. At least that's how it
> feels to me.
You call that an explanation? This is the kind of thing that gets
memetics a bad name.
-- Best regards, Robin mailto:email@example.com =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 21 Jul 2005 - 16:10:01 GMT