From: Keith Henson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed 20 Jul 2005 - 13:57:16 GMT
At 09:46 PM 19/07/05 +0100, Alan Patrick wrote:
>>I'm not convinced that it's a matter of being parasitic - well only in
>>the sense that you can't have an objecting-to-Harry-Potter meme-set
>>without having Harry Potter in the first place.
>I think I buy your overall explanation here, though I am becoming
>increasingly intrigued with the idea of memetic parasitism, and maybe
>symbiotic memes. I don't know of any detailed work in this area, but by
>empirical observation it seems that religion and politics are very
You have to be careful here about what is being parasitized.
With respect to humans and/or their genes, all memes are ranged along a
deadly-parasite to mutualistic-symbiote spectrum. (Heaven's Gate to shoe
You then have a second level where memes depend on other memes to exist.
I.e., you don't get a shirt button meme without a shirt meme in the first
place. :-) And sometimes non-material religious/political memes depends
on another non-material meme.
An example I have used in the past is that the fairly hot expansion of
space colony meme that started up in the mid 70s was partly in reaction to
the depressing limits to growth meme that had been widespread and ascendant
in the previous 5 years or so.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 20 Jul 2005 - 14:16:41 GMT