Re: Durkheim redux

From: Bill Spight (
Date: Thu 14 Apr 2005 - 05:18:58 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: Durkheim redux"

    Dear Chris,

    > Cultural memes can be regenerated by artefacts according to a posse
    > on here yes? Is pop art culture? Is 'natural' art? Is Nature itself?
    > Where is the demarcation between culture and environment? This is a
    > meaningless distinction.

    Please correct me if I am wrong, but from what you say, you are not claiming that ~memes are cultural (since 'culture' is meaningless). That is rather different from what the meme machinists are saying.



    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 14 Apr 2005 - 05:38:15 GMT