The deadly Force of the Left- Hand

From: Van oost Kenneth (
Date: Sun 12 Dec 2004 - 15:40:32 GMT

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: The deadly Force of the Left- Hand"

    << Alexander The Great was one, Billy The Kid and John McEnroe were others. Scientists now think how to explain why people use their left- hand and it all got to do with winning a fight.

    About 10% use their left- hand to do things instead of using their right one. For biologists it was for many years unknown why such an important minority was getting born. It is known however that left- handed people get worse health- problems and are involved in more serious accidents than right- handed ones. Because these people are for the rest totally identical, you should except that for the greater part of the story the genetic defined left- handiness should had died out. So, there must be a hidden reason that contradicts the risks of being left- handed all together, but biologists weren 't able untill now to find it.

    In times that troubles were settled with our bare hands, left- handed people got the advantage of the surprise/ sneak attack. That advantage could only stay in existence if left- handed people stayed a minority, otherwise right- handed ones could easily adapt themselves fighting left- handed adversaries. Investigators of the University of Montpellier have now found strong arguments for this controversial idea. They are convinced that the extent of violence within a pre- industrial society plays a role in how high the number of left- handed people will be. Charlotte Faurie and Michel Raymond discovered that with the rising of violent agression within a society the number of left- handed people increased.

    Faurie:- " We discovered a direct relation between the extent of violence within a certain society and the number of left- handed people. That points to the fact that fighting is an important selectioncriteria for the evolution of left- handiness. "

    They admitted however that the numbers of manslaughter, wherein also the number of executions and gangkillings were included, wasn 't a very reliable standard for the number of man- to- man combats, but it was the best they got.
    " The result is a strong argument for the fight hypothesis. But in general it points to the importance of violence in the evolution of left- and right- handiness."

    It is proven that left- handiness is an advantage in sports like tennis, cricket, boxing or baseball, whereby there is a direct confrontation between 2 adver- saries. By other sports, like gymnastics there is no advantage in being left- or right- handed. Faurie and Raymond believe that confrontationsports like judo and karate do alike violent man- to- man combats.
    " Interactive sports in Western society are special forms of combat, with strong and severe ruling, including the interdiction to kill or to hurt the adversary on purpose. If left- handed people do have an important advantage in fighting sports when they are part of a minority than the same can be said for a real fight or battle situation. " is their claim.

    " If this is correct than is the advantage of left- handiness greater in a violent environment, what in the end should result in even more left- handed people. " And that is just what the 2 investigators determined while looking at the numbers of manslaughter in 8 different societies. They concluded that the Dioula- tribe of Burkina has the lowest level of murder and thus of left- handiness. The Yanamamo and the people of the Jim- Valley in Papoea New- Guinia have the highist number. Faurie says that the advantage of being left- handed should only, in principle stay in existence within man because those behave the most violently in each investigated society.

    Professor Chris McManus of University College of London however is not yet convinced. He claims that the data is mis- interpreted and that the test- groups were to small and the used methods unreliable. There must be according the to professor an advantage in being left- handed, but it is still unclear what it consist of. According to his own theory, despite the many disadvantages of being left- handed, left- handed people show a greater deal of creativity and other positive aspects.

    " And society needs a subgroup of people who are different. "

    DM, Steve Connor 09/ 12/ 2004, translated by Kenneth Van Oost.

    My comments,

    If this is true we should atleast aspect an increase of left- handed people amongst members of LA and New York streetgangs ! Do we possess data !?

    If this were to be true, than atleast we will aspect an increase of left- handed people amongst the decendents of those kid- soldiers of Burundi and Rwanda ! Will we ever get to those !?

    If this is not far away from the truth, we should atleast aspect an increase of left- handed people amongst the decendents of those who are now wandering the earth ! Will it ever reach its top !?



    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 12 Dec 2004 - 15:40:03 GMT