From: John Wilkins (email@example.com)
Date: Fri 12 Mar 2004 - 04:53:15 GMT
On 12/03/2004, at 3:37 PM, Scott Chase wrote:
> This ought to lighten the mood and get Keith and Chris off eachother's
> case for a moment:
> I realize that there are two versions of psychohistory floating out
> there in the ether, Asimov's and the one described in the above URL,
> but the latter sounds rather...ummm...interesting to be overly kind.
It's not even interesting enough to be not even wrong... cyclic
history? In this day and age (note: deliberate irony there)?
> On an history of ideas note, the psychobiography of Jung to be exact,
> here's another URL from the CG Jung page that could be of interest,
> from a Dark Lord of the Sith, to Jungians anyway, Richard Noll:
> It's his article "Jung's Concept of Die Dominanten (The Dominants)". A
> little more serious in nature than the article on psychohistory was.
Archetypus was used by Oken - I don't know enough Goethe to say (hey, if it's not in Volume One of Faustus, I haven't read it). But as a biological term it was popularised, at least, by Owen in England.
-- Dr John S Wilkins Head, Communication Services The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Parkville, Victoria, Australia =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 12 Mar 2004 - 05:05:46 GMT