From: Van oost Kenneth (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun 07 Mar 2004 - 10:38:06 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Henson" <email@example.com>
> "In none of these cases was there any likelihood, as the Chicago
> Tribune noted, of the actors in life having read the books they were
> spiritedly staging. "Ideas have a life of their own," the Daily News
> interviewer tentatively ventured, but he may have been surprised as G.K.
> "agreed heartily" in the words, "I am no dirty nominalist." "
" It may be an illusion to believe that ideas are the esssence of social
life; but it is not an illusion to believe that they are relatively
it, since this is itself a material fact with particular social
determinations . "
Terry Eagleton, Ideology, An Introduction 1991 page 75.
He says this in relation to what Marx (1818- 1883) and Engels ( 1820- 1895)
had to say.
They don 't say that ideas have a life of their own, not at least in so many
words but I am pretty sure that if we read Das Kapital ( Marx) and the
communist Manifest ( Engels/ Marx) in German that references to the quote
will pop up.
So, in essence the idea/ assumption that " ideas " had a life of their own
was pretty much part of the social discourse ' round that period...thus even
before your 1910.
Or is that too much too far from the intented search....
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 07 Mar 2004 - 10:48:49 GMT