From: Keith Henson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri 13 Feb 2004 - 07:07:55 GMT
At 02:36 PM 13/02/04 +1100, Steven wrote:
>'The fault of the biological sociologists was not that they used it
>[analogy] but that they used it wrongly. Instead of trying to control
>their studies of society by their knowledge of biology, they tied to infer
>the laws of the first from the laws of the second. Such inference is
>worthless. If the laws governing natural life are found also in society,
>they are found in different forms and with specific characteristics which
>do not permit conjecture by analogy and can only be understood by direct
>So much for those who think that Durkheim's work can be connected to
I don't really know enough of the background here to comment.
>Memetics is hostile to all forms of sociology, both the good and the bad.
But I don't know why you make such a statement. Memetics takes off from a
nearly trivial observation, animals can learn from each other, and what is
learned is subject to the same kinds of selection (including neutral drift)
that drives evolution. Sociologists have demonstrated this in (for
example) studies of rumors.
Memetics is a way of looking at the waxing and waning of the elements that
make up our intellectual culture. Memes (information) lie behind every bit
of our material culture and have been at least since our remote ancestors
started chipping rocks.
"Memeticist" is not a recognized specialization yet. The people I know who
know the most about the subject are not hostile to sociology to the best of
Since you *are* a sociologist, you have standing to say for the community
that sociology and sociologists are hostile to memetics, but I think you
should note that memetics is *taught* in some sociology courses
Blackmore, Susan. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford U. Press.
Aunger, Robert. 2002. The Electric Meme. The Free Press
Among the reading materials.
Memetics Page http://www.uio.no/~mwatz/memetics/index.html
Memetics Bib http://www.xs4all.nl/~hingh/alt.memetics/faq.html Readings Dawkins, Richard. 1976. "Memes: The New Replicators," The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press. : 203-215. Grant, Glenn. "A Memetic Lexicon," boing-boing : 4- 7. Axelrod, Robert and Douglas Dion. 1988. "The Further Evolution of Cooperation," Scientific American (Dec 9): 1385-1389. Bass, Thomas. 1993. "Forgiveness Math," Discover (May) : 63-67.
Sociology 200: Introduction to Anthropology
TTh 9:30-10:50 in Main 122
Dr. Terry Ferguson
Course Introduction, Personal and Cultural Bias, Memetics and Worldview
Brodie Intro-Ch. 3,
Memes and Cultural Bias Revisited
Brodie Ch. 5, (Review Ch. 1-4)Dawkins article
"The Selfish Meme" "Shock of the Other" (Milllineum part1); "Strange Relations" (Millineum part2)
Looking over the syllabus, they read most of Richard Brodie's book.
These three examples are from the first two pages Google returns for
"sociology memetics course."
PS. I thought of one possibility. If sociology is (in your opinion)
opposed to evolution than what you say makes sense.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 13 Feb 2004 - 07:14:10 GMT