From: Dace (email@example.com)
Date: Mon 26 Jan 2004 - 17:33:15 GMT
> From: Keith Henson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> At 11:38 AM 24/01/04 -0800, Ted wrote:
> >That chimps are known . . . .
> I started to respond, but there are so many factual errors it just doesn't
> seem worth it.
Can you point to a specific factual error?
> If you want to know what is really known about these subjects, one of the
> best places is MOTHER NATURE: A HISTORY OF MOTHERS, INFANTS AND NATURAL
> SELECTION BY SARAH BLAFFER HRDY,
I read the review, and it's quite interesting. However, it has nothing to
do with Ehrenreich's thesis about the origin of war.
> And, of course, the works of Jane Goodall.
> But the idea of war only being 12,000 years old has no real support.
Except for the evidence. There's no *evidence* for war prior to that time.
What's significant is that there's plenty of evidence up to that time,
consisting not only of physical evidence such as spear points embedded in
human skeletons but cultural evidence such as cave drawings of soldiers
lined up for battle. Nothing like this appears further back into the
> time humans run up against ecological limits you are going to see war, and
> our line has been doing that for millions of years.
Apparently not. What's interesting is not simply that war itself is a meme
(or set of memes) but that the idea that war is part of our nature is also a meme, though obviously of more recent vintage.
You also wrote that you're not aware of big cat predation on human beings.
This was established by C.K. Brain in the 1980s by reinterpreting evidence
dug up by Raymond Dart in South Africa many years earlier. Dart assumed
that the bones of humans found among many other species demonstrated that
these people had feasted on the other species. Brain proved that the humans
were simply another item on the menu, and that site was actually a leopard's
lair. (Brain, C.K., *The Hunters or the Hunted? An Introduction to African
Cave Taphonomy,* University of Chicago Press, 1981).
I appreciate you comments. Whether or not I'm right about war, this sort of
exchange is the bread and butter of memetics. There's no semiotic shortcut
here. Only the long, difficult work of assembling convincing case studies
can establish memetics as a respected science.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 26 Jan 2004 - 17:44:10 GMT