From: Alan Patrick (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed 17 Dec 2003 - 12:49:46 GMT
> But he also seems drawn out of his element and outflanked by better-funded
> and far less scrupulous adversaries. Drexler's seniority in the field and
> the scientific logic of his position are unassailable, while that of his
> detractors is questionable.
As you said above, its the money - this is the brightest new New Thing in
tech circles. Also, the book from Michael Crichton won't have helped the PR
of MNT a lot.
Drexler's problem is that he hasn't really done anything new since 1992, so
he's leaving himself open to new players. Also, if you look back at most
births of new things in science you will see the same unedifying spectacle -
very seldom is the guy credited in the history book the one who really did
the real thinking. Memes are not faithful in the way they hitch their
waggons to the next thing that advances their progress.
> By now, the military
> must have a black program to develop MNT before the Chinese or Arabs or
> Russians get it.
I would say the Russians and Chinese are already working on it, maybe with
western corporate funding. Add to that the Indians, all of Europe,
Australia, Japan, and the Science councils of a dozen emerging countries.
Nano is pretty old hat, most universities around the world are working on it
somewhere. For Crichton to write a book on it means its already hit tipping
point public perception.
What is more interesting is to think through just why teh NNI is going
after him now - the stable door is well open so what is the NNI's purpose so
late in the game . He is clearly perceived as a major threat by them, but
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 17 Dec 2003 - 12:58:25 GMT