From: derek gatherer (email@example.com)
Date: Mon 13 Oct 2003 - 08:08:01 GMT
--- Bill Hall <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Thus, the applicability of the term does not
> necessarily assume an
> acceptance of a memetic interpretation of the nature
> of belief and
That's true. It's not absolutely necessary.
> To me, the concept of a tipping point relates more
> to the concept of a
> Kuhnian paradigm shift, when the accumulation of
> acceptance and evidence
> reaches a point of inflection where the new paradigm
> becomes dominant.
But does the new paradigm become instantly dominant?
The cultural selectionist view would be that there is
period where rival research programmes compete, and
that may well be after the point of inflection, but
before the achievment of dominance.
For instance, in evolutionary biology, the point of
inflection for the 'New Synthesis' was probably
Fisher's 1930 book, but dominance had to wait until
the 50s (see Steve Gould's "Structure of Evolutionary
Theory", Harvard, Belknap.)
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 13 Oct 2003 - 08:17:26 GMT