Re: Serious concern/ addition 2

From: Van oost Kenneth (
Date: Sun 07 Sep 2003 - 07:46:26 GMT

  • Next message: "Re: Serious concern/ addition 2"

    MessageOk, thanks for this ! But was he convicted for taking a video earlier to that specific incident !? Strange anyway if you ask me !

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Virginia Bowen
      Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 10:04 PM
      Subject: RE: Serious concern/ addition 2

      Just want to set the record straight if you're talking about the incident in Los Angeles -- the man who took the video was violating his probation for a prior conviction, so was jailed for probation violation, not for violating privacy.

      Murrieta, CA
      "My treasures do not clink together nor glitter. They gleam in the sun and bray in the night."
        -----Original Message-----

          Yes, but that is not to say that all problems are solved. Recently, policemen were set free
          after they bodily harmed a black young man. Those policeman were set free, the guy who
          took the shot was prosecuted for violating the privacy of those man ! Oh, come on Jon, still
          such matters work trought and on one final day the horror will start again.

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 07 Sep 2003 - 07:45:54 GMT