From: Van oost Kenneth (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed 25 Jun 2003 - 20:21:16 GMT
----- Original Message -----
> > Replication/ prolification are induced by the venue in which you live,
> > can be a result of the emotional state you were in, what kind of
> > people you meet, what kind of people you talked to, etc...but all
> > those examples are part of some venue which acts as agents, it reacts
> > and evolves along the way, it influences. And all of the unfortunate
> > replications are too part of a venue, prompted or not, being part of
> > the atheist- side of the coin I am prompted any- way to disgard
> > salvation, what matters wether the meme/ information can convince me
> > or you to change sides....
> When one is forced to expand the concept of venue to include the not-
> yet-but-soon-to-be communicated memes in the memeplexures or
> cognitive gestalts of one's interlocuters, the concept of venue itself has
> lost all currency and value.
<You don 't have to ! Just take into account there are such ' future memes '
present, already influencing others, reacting upon and evolving....
I already talked you about this in earlier posts, it is, at least IMHO, of
importance to know that what you do is important for the opertional
schema of cultural evolution, but what you don 't do is of equal impor-
tance, you need both sides.
Acting in cases of an emergency is important, but doing nothing and
letting experts do their jobs is of equal importance........
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 25 Jun 2003 - 20:28:03 GMT