From: Van oost Kenneth (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed 25 Jun 2003 - 20:09:15 GMT
----- Original Message -----
> Then whyu do vastly differing performances communicate the
> instructions for the recipient to engage in nearly identical performances,
> while performances that differ by a single syllable or gesture can
> provoke widely different performances in the recipients?
<That is because venue parameters are set in such a way that perfor-
mances ( must) keep on going, thus to maintain the venue itself.
There are 1000 ways that force you to remerber your birthday, but
only one will be the trigger.
The venue has a 1000 ways to elicit expected performances which
IMO are not important. What is, is what is getting performed at the
end of the trip.
There are 1000 ways to drive a car, but that ain 't important to the
specific venue, the driving itself IS.
There are other venues to elicit performances of how you drive your
car, or in what way ( where, when and how) did you learn it,....
<The other side can be cleared by the following, sending ( post)-
cards, a performance that differs by gesture/ context, can indeed
provoke widely different performances in the recipients. Think of
you sending cards for birthdays, for an announcement of a birth,
you showing sympathy by the death of..., New Year, Easter, ect...
The recipient will perform accordingly, happy, with gladness,
hopefull for the future, sending you one back, throwing it in the
It is what, when and how that is important, context related....
<You ask ' WHY ', all is a matter of the venue eliciting ex-
Because the performances ENCODE memes, and tiny encoding
changes can make great semantic differences, while the selfsame
semantics may be encoded in multiple ways.
<Yes, tiny encoding changes can make great semantic differences,
but is that important for the venue !? If it happens, IMO that is
just one more possible way added by the already existing 1000
of remerbering your birthday !
If I do send a card, lets say to the girl nextdoor, something I never
did in the past, instead of wishing her joy for the day just by speaking
the words out loud, wouldn 't that provoke a great semantic differen-
ce in her mind !? What would she think, that I am in love with her,
or just making a pass,.... !? But is this of importance to the venue
eliticing expected performances for remerbering birthdays !?
IMO, it doesn 't ! The remerberance itself IS important !!
Next time around she will ' remerber '.....
<Is the encoding of the memes within the performance of any
importance, probably it is, but like I said, is this of any importance
to the specific venue eliciting the performances !?
IMO, it doesn 't !
Does the changed encoding of the memes has any percussion on
how and why we behave in the way we do, probably, but do we
know !? Are we conscient aware of those tiny changes, and if
we are not and we are confronted with the great semantic diffe-
rences do we go out there in search for their causes !?
Probably not !
Memetic evolution is so ' fast ' that we ain't see its passing....all
is the same but quite different.....
<And yes, the selfsame semantics may be encoded in multiple ways,
those are just the individualisticly, personal meme that serves the
mind to remerber your birthday when your ' trigger ' passes by...
Everybody remerbers his/ hers birthday ( selfsame semantic) but
the remerberance itself is encoded in a 1000 ways.
> It is this inconvenient yet undeniable rock
> upon which your 'memeisthemotion' pseudomodel crashes, founders
> and sinks, and you cannot answer or remove it.
I don 't speak for Wade but is this not a little bit premature !?
And to what extend has this bird crashed..........!?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 25 Jun 2003 - 20:17:00 GMT