RE: back to basics

From: Scott Chase (
Date: Thu 29 May 2003 - 00:35:47 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "RE: Watches & Necklaces"

    >From: "Richard Brodie" <>
    >To: <>
    >Subject: RE: back to basics
    >Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 16:44:58 -0700
    >Lawry wrote:
    ><<Hi Richard, yes, I think it must have been over a year ago, several
    >of the list specified that memetic engineering was not possible.>>
    >Perhaps we ought to split this into two lists, one for people interested in
    >memetics and one for people who wish to argue that memetics is stupid and
    That would be swell. Then the memeticists could get on with uncritical speculating without worry of detractors.

    If memetics doesn't start generating more self-critical unbiased types that hold *ideas* at arms length or devil advocates that try to poke holes in the theories, all that may emerge is a mutual admiration society.

    _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 29 May 2003 - 00:41:19 GMT