RE: back to basics

From: Keith Henson (
Date: Thu 29 May 2003 - 00:14:21 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "RE: back to basics"

    At 04:44 PM 28/05/03 -0700, you wrote:
    >Lawry wrote:
    ><<Hi Richard, yes, I think it must have been over a year ago, several
    >of the list specified that memetic engineering was not possible.>>
    >Perhaps we ought to split this into two lists, one for people interested in
    >memetics and one for people who wish to argue that memetics is stupid and

    Or perhaps move back to usenet. There was some decent discussion on alt.memetics. Higher signal to noise ratio than you see here.

    Keith Henson

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 29 May 2003 - 00:19:00 GMT