From: Wade T. Smith (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun 25 May 2003 - 19:29:29 GMT
On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 02:58 PM, Joe wrote:
> But the point of your 'performance only'
> model is that only the action matters, The action of speaking is
> different from the action of writing. Thus, the same words,
> communicated by these two different systems, even if they are both
> communicated in english, require completely different performances.
> This disparity of action leading to equivalent understanding is a fact
> your shema cannot abide.
There is nothing about the performance model as I and others have
elucidated it that I can recognize in your criticisms or attempts at
explanations of it. Whatever model you refer to above is certainly not
it. Perhaps you will elucidate this model you call 'performance only'.
It does not seem to correspond to the model I have posited, at all, and
thus it is not 'mine'.
I don't, quite literally, know what you are talking about, but I do
know it is _not_ the performance model as it has been explained by
myself and others.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 25 May 2003 - 19:35:33 GMT