From: Wade T. Smith (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun 25 May 2003 - 19:02:59 GMT
On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 02:58 PM, Gudmundur wrote:
> But if it weren't for an existing interpretative context (scientists'
> minds and other paraphernalia) published genes would not mean anything
> to anyone. Similarly, for DNA to convey any information there has to
> be the interpretative environment of the cell. So, a more accurate
> view of information is to see it as emerging when some system
> (scientist, cell, etc.) interprets a series of signifiers/signs (DNA,
> letters, etc.).
And there it is.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 25 May 2003 - 19:09:05 GMT