From: Gudmundur Ingi Markusson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri 23 May 2003 - 16:10:54 GMT
>Gudmundur Ingi Markusson wrote:
>>(GIM) I agree. The assumption that information simply resides in books or otherwise, waiting to be incorporated by hosts, which seems to be taken for granted in much memetic discussion, is misguided. Here I think Peirce is useful. In the light of his semiosis concept, information is not a dyadic relation, a carrier carrying something (signifier incorporating a signified), but a triadic relation, where information arises only when a subject interprets a signifier (sign-vehicle).
>All of which is to say that mentalist memetics gets tripped up on a point that linguists and semioticians have understood for a century or so.
Actually, I see it more as a hurdle to "jet set" memetics, such as Blackmore's, where memes seem to jump in tact from books to brains to the internet, and what have you.
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 23 May 2003 - 16:16:16 GMT