Re: Performance vs. Mind

From: Philip Jonkers (
Date: Fri 16 May 2003 - 13:14:50 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "RE: transmission"

    > I find memes in the mind to be a more intuitive
    >way of thinking about memes. It's easier to explain to people. It's not
    >TRUE. But then, no model is true.

    In science, thinking in terms of black and white is usually not very expedient. If you adopt the entire spectrum of grey colors a whole magnificent world of tolerance and possibility opens up. Models of even the simplest of systems are not true, that's why they are called models to begin with. A model aims at capturing the essentials of the system it is supposed to describe. By the inherently sheer complexity of the system and the inherently sheer lack of computing power and/or skillfulness on the part of the modeler, the model almost per se is but an approximation to the real system. The accuracy of the approximation with respect to the real system at hand (TRUTH content, if you will) depends on the ingenuity and skillfulness of the modeler among other things.

    So, to recap, indeed while no model really is true in the purely black and white sense some models are more true than others if you are willing to allow all those glorious shades of gray. The trick, or art if you like, relevant in science is to find models that give you maximum amounts of truth content (in the least amount of effort).


    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 16 May 2003 - 13:20:38 GMT