From: Wade T. Smith (email@example.com)
Date: Thu 15 May 2003 - 20:26:44 GMT
On Thursday, May 15, 2003, at 03:31 PM, Joe wrote:
> Deciding to drink one's thousandth beer is very different from a spider
> following a hard-wired instinctual program to weave its thousandth web
Never said it wasn't.
> one falls into the trap of implicitly denying conscious self-
> awareness and choice at the very moment one is exercising them.
I'm still at a complete loss to understand why you think that is
something I am falling into.
The human, at all times and in all activities (well, most of them,
certainly, and certainly memetic ones) is consciously self-aware and
Again, I am not declaring that any agency of choice is inadmissable-
just the contrary, it is choice and self-awareness that makes people
part of the cultural process.
But, regardless of how automatic any one person's behavior is- and that
is all I'm trying to say with the web analogy, that many activities are
automatic and yet different every time- such behavior is still,
regardless of instinctual forces to make them all the same,
differentiated by the actual performance of the process because the
parameters of the venue are different, be it web-making or
speech-making, or singing 'London Bridge is Falling Down'.
The performance model does not, however, attempt to explain human
beings, which, I guess, you are thinking it tries to do or I'm trying
to do with it. It doesn't. It only attempts to explain, in a darwinian
fashion, the mechanisms and agents of cultural evolution. And it
doesn't want to explain the mind, and it doesn't have to. People do
what people do, and the evolution of culture is a processional result
of what they do, in the groups that they do it, in the spaces they do
it in. What they think before they do things is, well, irrelevant.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 15 May 2003 - 20:33:03 GMT