Re: memetics-digest V1 #1329

From: Wade T. Smith (
Date: Thu 01 May 2003 - 15:07:29 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1329"

    On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 08:12 AM, memetics-digest wrote:

    > I mean that (for example) when catching a cricket
    > ball you _do not_ do the maths, you just match to your previous
    > experiences of catching (and the eidos of it you have refined over the
    > years - in effect a fully functional toy/model of the behaviour, built
    > by tuning though, not metrication).

    That _is_ 'doing the maths'. We are _built_ to 'do the maths'. We _do_ the maths. We correspond with physical reality which has to follow physical laws. 'Maths' just explain what we do in another form.

    - Wade

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 01 May 2003 - 15:16:14 GMT