From: Wade T. Smith (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu 01 May 2003 - 15:07:29 GMT
On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 08:12 AM, memetics-digest wrote:
> I mean that (for example) when catching a cricket
> ball you _do not_ do the maths, you just match to your previous
> experiences of catching (and the eidos of it you have refined over the
> years - in effect a fully functional toy/model of the behaviour, built
> by tuning though, not metrication).
That _is_ 'doing the maths'. We are _built_ to 'do the maths'. We _do_
the maths. We correspond with physical reality which has to follow
physical laws. 'Maths' just explain what we do in another form.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 01 May 2003 - 15:16:14 GMT