From: Van oost Kenneth (email@example.com)
Date: Thu 10 Apr 2003 - 19:25:06 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wade T. Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Not to nit- pick but in the end it all boils down to what we
> > individualisticly perceive and in what ways our brain process
the information. Wade,
> No.... What it all boils down to is the way we _perform_ the
Ok, Wade, fair enough ! I will, in the future choose my words
more carefully, but anyway in the ways we perform the info
I still perceive an individualistic bias_ genetic or one other.
There is noone ' performing ' actualy the info he/ she has in
his or her brain, what comes out as ' performance ' is been
adjusted, influenced, judged,... by the info already present
and that IMHO is still and will always be individualisticly in
Noone for that matter can ' perform ' ( imitate) the info
I want to send across the way I did, there is already the
time/ space difference, but also due to the differences which
exist between me and the people who wants to perform
the info I lay out for them.
What you can do yourself, you do better !
The way by which we perform any information is indi-
vidualisticly coloured, I agree influenced by cultural/social
agreement and consensus but in anyway it boils down
to how our personal neural networks are particular con-
nected_ and there isn 't a brain the same_ contents- like !
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 10 Apr 2003 - 19:11:25 GMT