From: Wade T. Smith (email@example.com)
Date: Thu 06 Mar 2003 - 17:32:00 GMT
On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 11:49 AM, memetics-digest wrote:
> Let's say I *don't* buy the house. My impression is
> that you would say this lack of action has no meaning at all.
I would say I would not have had, nor could I have deducted, any idea
that you were thinking of buying a house at all, unless you tell me
(perform) that you were.
Thus your not buying the house indeed has no meaning, to the time/space
of social performance, whatsoever, as it was not a player on that
field, thus it has no meaning to culture, thus it has no meaning to
memetics, which is the discovery of darwinian processes in cultural
What is not performed is not created in cultural time/space, and cannot
be a player in the memetic field. Even the substitute players are
presented upon the bench for all to see, as sitting on a bench being
ready to play is also a performance in the time/space, but, not even
being there is not. In this case of yours, and in the case of Joe's
singing, there was not even a potential player evident upon a bench.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 06 Mar 2003 - 17:28:44 GMT