From: Wade T. Smith (email@example.com)
Date: Sun 02 Mar 2003 - 17:06:26 GMT
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 11:36 AM, memetics-digest wrote:
>> The memeinthemind model is dependent upon a ghost.
> No, it is dependent upon a multiplicity of similar, but not identical,
> minds. The precise encodings of the memes do not have to be
> identical; rather they must, when interacting with differing yet
> cognitive gestalts, result in those gestalts producing recognizably
> similar behaviors (including bodily action and its subsets
> communication and artifact creation).
There are many gestalts resulting in 'recognizably similar' behaviors,
just as one may stop a car using a disc brake or a drum brake. You are
saying that human brains are similar, but how does one come to any
conclusions about the information inside the individual brains,
regardless of the similar behaviors? And what does one do with similar
behaviors produced by gestalts from disparate brains? What is the
rationale for claiming similar behaviors have to stem from similar, if
not identical, gestalts?
This imagined rationale is the central fallacy of the memeinmind model.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 02 Mar 2003 - 17:03:03 GMT