Fwd: Speak, Memory

From: Wade T. Smith (wade.t.smith@verizon.net)
Date: Mon 20 Jan 2003 - 15:36:56 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Ehrlich's _Human Natures_"

    Frontiers by Gareth Cook

    Speak, Memory

    As certain as many of us are that we recall events when we were 3 or even younger, scientific research suggests otherwise.

    I was driving down the street when I glanced over and saw a tear sliding down my wife's cheek.

    "What if we die," she said, "and Aidan doesn't remember us?" Aidan is our son. He just turned 1.

    Even putting aside the morbid fear that something will happen to us - a part of the mental illness called "parenthood" - it's a disturbing idea. So much would vanish: watching trains, reading Goodnight Moon, playing the game where I slice strawberries into a bowl and put it on a low ledge for him to find.

    I can tell him about these things when he is older, but he'll shrug. I will probably forget most of them myself.

    For scientists, memory is proving an elusive target. They are making progress in understanding how the brain's development makes memory possible. But it is also becoming clear that neuroscience alone can't explain memory. Memory is tied to our ability to talk, to our ideas of who we are, even to our place in the social universe. Sometimes we talk about things so we'll remember them.

    When Conor Liston was an undergraduate at Harvard, he did a simple series of experiments that probed the beginnings of memory. The results, published recently in the journal Nature, show that people undergo a memory revolution at about age 1. And they show how difficult memory is to capture in a lab.

    Liston, who is now an MD/PhD student at Cornell University and the Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, recruited groups of very young children, aged 9 months, 17 months, and 24 months. He then had them watch while an experimenter enacted a sequence of actions and encouraged the children to copy them.

    For example, the experimenter would say "Cleanup time!" while wiping a table with a paper towel and then throw the towel into a wastebasket.
    (At this age, obviously, children are too young to be given purely verbal information to remember.) Then, four months later, the children were invited back and given the props and the verbal cue (such as
    "Cleanup time!") to see if they would reenact what they had seen earlier. The older two groups did well, while the youngest group did poorly: Something happens in those six months around the first birthday.

    In his Nature paper, which he wrote with Harvard psychologist Jerome Kagan, Liston suggests that the changes may have something to do with the development of the frontal lobe, which is involved in many higher functions of the brain.

    But in looking for the origins of memory, he says, you can't just look at the brain. For example, at 6 months, babies can remember events for up to 24 hours. And at 9 months, they can remember events for up to a month. But things leave the realm of today's neuroscience and become almost philosophical when you ask the question "What is your earliest memory?"

    Liston says his first memory is standing with his mother and grandmother, telling his grandmother what he wants for his third birthday. He remembers his mother being pregnant and being mad at him for issuing a set of birthday demands.

    But conventional wisdom has it that most people can't remember much that happened to them before about age 5. One reason is that it takes children a while to discover the concept of self-identity: You can't really remember things about yourself until you have a sense of who you are.

    Most children need to reach about 20 months before they will even pass the "rouge test." Put a blotch of red on their nose and hold them up to the mirror. If they reach for their real nose, not the one in the mirror, it shows some rudimentary sense of self.

    It takes longer, though, to develop the idea that you are a being, separate from the world, that continues through time: Something happened to me yesterday, the same me that is here now. This is so much a part of how we adults think that it is difficult to imagine thinking any differently. (Perhaps it could be said that all young children experience Zen consciousness.)

    Memory is also intertwined with language. Liston can't be sure whether he is really remembering the scene at age 3 or just remembering a scene constructed in his mind from conversations about it later.

    Someday, I'm sure my wife or I will ask: "Do you remember, Aidan, how you used to walk over here and pick strawberries from this bowl?" And then we'll probably ask until he does remember.

    Gareth Cook can be reached by e-mail at cook@globe.com.

    This story ran in the Boston Globe Magazine on 1/19/2003. Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company.

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 20 Jan 2003 - 15:36:24 GMT