From: Grant Callaghan (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat 18 Jan 2003 - 03:40:48 GMT
>Addiction clearly has cultural aspects as well as physical ones because the
>genetics of the population does not change as fast as we see epidemic use
>rise and fall.
>The extreme social reaction to drugs (itself a meme) is a bit of a mystery.
> I speculate that the strong reaction to drugs may be due to drugs taking
>the place of social approval rewards.
From my own experience, drugs as a social outlet are the prime reason for
getting involved with them. A bar is not just a place to go and drink. It
is a place where people go to socialize and those people feel that alchohol
looses the inhibitions and greases the wheels of social intercourse. Pot is
used in much the same way, and it makes people feel closer in that you soon
find the only people you feel comfortable with are people you smoke with.
This is a dead end, however, in that pretty soon all of your friends are pot
heads and by definition not a group heavy on signs of success. The same
trend applies to coke and opiates in that people who use them find themselve
cut off from the rest of society. Among nonusers, the user is constantly in
fear of being caught and either getting fired or going to jail. This makes
working and socializing a source of paranoia and fear.
So the social incentives and disincentives are strong memetic pressures on
the drug user. I found the easiest way to kick all of my bad habits was to
stop associating with users at all. This meant a complete change of social
activities and the types of people I hung around with, but in the end it was
a pretty painless transition from user to nonuser. Without the social
pressures of strung-out friends trying to push the stuff on me I didn't have
much trouble quitting completely. It was the military that made me an
alcoholic with endless reasons for getting together to drink. The officers
were even required to throw a party periodically in which they got each
other totally soused. Not throwing a party could affect their chances for
One of the most dangerous memes in our society is the "fun" meme. The
things people do for "fun" are among the most destructive in the world and
cause untold suffering and misery to millions every year. People drink for
fun, take drugs for fun, drive too fast for fun, and so on. Movies glorify
the danger as something worth looking up to. The guy who can come closest
to getting killed without actually dying is looked upon as a hero. The bull
fighter is admired and rewarded for how close he can lean into the horns of
a bull without getting impaled. People are admired for the amount of
punishment they can take and still get up and take more.
All of this seems to me to be counterintuitive to survival of one's genes,
but it does become addictive. Fear and anger, it seems to me, can become
just as addictive as opiates or cocain. But the social element seems to
drive such people to flock together and share their exploits and reinforce
the thrill of activities that gave them the rush. For this reason, I would
say the social forces -- the memetic aspect -- are just as much a part of
addiction as drugs , whether they're emotional, imbibed or injected.
If you listen to the man who feeds on anger, all you'll hear him talk about
is what makes him angry. It gives him a reason to communicate. It gives
him something to talk about. And the rush is neverending because he
manufactures it within himself. And as the TV show, Becker, demonstrates,
it also makes for good comedy.
Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 18 Jan 2003 - 03:40:32 GMT