Date: Mon 11 Nov 2002 - 20:25:28 GMT
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <email@example.com>
> > Having experienced the tender mercies of Saddamic rule, the people
> > of Iraq are desperate for a freer and less painful alternative, but
> > the only way to remove an absolute dictator is by assassination (not
> > easy, since he moves between 50 palaces, has a dozen body doubles,
> > and the is guarded by his extended family) or militarily. The
> > problem with the Shah was his abuses using his secret police, SAVAK,
> > which, unfortunately, the US helped to train. That is what gave
> > Khomeini his opening. It's kinda hard to convince US-haters that
> > the US isn't into that kinda thing any more since the Cold War
> > ended, but it's true.
> Now you' re saying that the US is fighting all of its battles with its
> visor raised, that the preparations for the war against Iraq are
> tranparent, that the US is openly showing what they got in mind !?
> There has to be an opening in Saddams armour, there has to be one or
> more Iraqi guys willing to kill him for at least one million dollar !?
> On the other hand, I doubt that, knowing indeed his methodes and
> knowing in what ways he is in control...
Well, no one, least of all Saddam Hussein, should labor under any illusions regarding the US's intentions towards him should he refuse to disarm. The US is being quite up-front, blunt and forthright about it.
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 11 Nov 2002 - 20:28:53 GMT