From: William Benzon (email@example.com)
Date: Wed 06 Nov 2002 - 18:41:39 GMT
on 11/6/02 12:15 PM, Othman Mohamed/CUSM/Reg06/SSSS at
> Just would like to take your opinion guys about his book the electric meme. I
> bought the book few months ago and was hoping to enjoy reading it. I read only
> up to chapter seven and then had to put the book down. I must admit that I was
> disapponted with the book. I found it kind of boring generally and it seemed
> to me that Robert was not very sure of what he was saying. What I didn't like
> the most is that he mentioned some scientificly wrong statments and didn't
> bother to check them before hand.
I published a rather unfavorable review of the book. His neuroscience is
shakier than his molecular biology.
Human Nature Review 2002 Volume 2: 454-462 (17 October)
URL of this document http://human-nature.com/nibbs/02/benzon.html
Colorless Green Homunculi by William L. Benzon
The Electric Meme: A New Theory of How We Think by Robert Aunger The Free
Press, 2002. ISBN: 0743201507
Though he wasn't the first to propose that culture evolves by a Darwinian
mechanism-F. T. Cloak (1973) was earlier-the idea has been associated with
Richard Dawkins ever since he coined the term "meme" in The Selfish Gene. As
genes are the fundamental replicating units of biological evolution, so
memes are the replicators of cultural evolution. In Dawkins' words (p. 192):
Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes fashions, ways of
making pots or of building arches. Just as genes propagate themselves in the
gene pool by leaping from body to body via sperms or eggs, so memes
propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain via a
process which, in the broad sense, can be called imitation.
Dawkins had little to say about just where one might look in the brain to
find memes and other memeticists have been content to follow him in that.
Robert Aunger, an anthropologist at the University of Cambridge, believes
that it is time memeticists end their agnosticism on this matter. To that
purpose he has written The Electric Meme.
It is best viewed as two books. One book is comprised of the first six
chapters, which are preparatory in nature, reviewing the current state of
memetics, alternative analyses of human cultural evolution, types of
replicator (DNA, prions, computer viruses), and the physical nature of
information. This book is competent, interesting, and thought provoking.
The second book sets forth Aunger's new theory of neuromemetics. It differs
from the first as night from day. For reasons that I cannot fathom, when
Aunger begins constructing his neural model he sheds the discipline of Dr.
Jekyll in favor of the random muttering of Mr. Hyde. This second book is a
failure. Aunger's ideas are vague, incoherent, and contradictory. Trying to
infuse his phrases and sentences with meaning made me feel like Hercules
fighting the many-headed Hydra. Every time Hercules cut one head off, two or
three others sprung up to replace it. Every time I've tried to patch one of
Aunger's coherence-leaks I've had to entertain a handful of improbable
assertions to make the one patch plausible. I cannot recommend this second
book to anyone for any purpose.
Full text http://human-nature.com/nibbs/02/benzon.html
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 06 Nov 2002 - 18:44:49 GMT