Re: electric meme bombs

From: Van oost Kenneth (
Date: Thu 31 Oct 2002 - 21:31:07 GMT

  • Next message: Wade Smith: "Re: electric meme bombs"

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wade Smith" <>

    > On Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 10:58 , Bill Spight wrote:
    > > Are you saying that the memory of the perfomer has nothing to do with
    > > the similarity? I think not, but that is not obvious from your
    > > statement. :-)
    > Beme1 is not beme2 but, yes, the similarities have a great deal to do
    > with the preparations made by the performers, and, yes, memory is a
    > prime agent in the preparatory process. (Joe's meme-ory storage.) One
    > would expect the memories of performers within the same culture to be
    > packed with much of the same information.
    > And thus, the bemes they each perform, to also have similarities.

    But that is no to say all observers have the same similarities too ! From our perspective they all may look alike, but each and all of them are set along different lines of time/ place and space. Each performance has each time a different interpretation if observed by any observer. And people will emphasize upon this difference to call it there own !



    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 31 Oct 2002 - 21:18:32 GMT