From: Van oost Kenneth (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu 31 Oct 2002 - 20:44:29 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com>
> On Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 03:05 , firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > If it is indeed "based upon his apprehension of the original", then it
> > is not totally new, but, along with the original, a token of their
> > meme-type.
> Nothing is primarily totally new, with few exceptions. Even alien life,
> if it took root here after being carried upon meteorites, is not new to
> the universe.
> But, yes, the common meme-type is what is similar, and allows patterned
> tracking, and provides the continuity we may call culture. The forces
> behind each bemes' creation are not new, but DNA-instructed ancient, if
> not downright hoary.
How do we find such common meme- type similarities !?
Are we conducting a search into etymology for meaning here or what !?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 31 Oct 2002 - 20:32:10 GMT